Modulation of Field Near the Earth's Surface

This may be achieved by a spinning wheel with a 0g lab between the outside of the spin and the inside axle of the wheel. The lab under consideration would be a room like a hall inside the spin of the machine for as much as it would reach. The centrifugal force of the wheel would stop the general motion of the field inside the wheel between the outside of the wheel and the center and cancel out the downward flow of gravity by expansion and cancelling the usual compression of the field. With the force of the earth pushing us up as much as we press down, this doesn't power 0 g force, we always feel the pressure of the force. Einstein was of the belief that gravity and inertia are the same in the Equivalence Principle of his General Theory. Like Mcutcheon, I think while they're related, the two are not the same since there is centrifugal force of the earth and moon and both have gravity, but the moon falls another speed around us than us, so the amount of fall can be at many speeds, so they are generally found in no definite ratio. However they are a lot alike but not the same even if so. Methods of generating inertia may change gravity. (If they were always the same they couldn't be changed and you'd weigh the same at the poles of the earth as in Amazon.com.). When you go on a summer festival wheel when you're upside down in the wheel and you're pressed against the inside of the wheel even with the force of gravity, the wheel would be a lifting force. A field is induced inside the machine, without the field you would have no way up just via the outward force of the wheel holding you inside.

Imagine if instead of the wheel going so fast it lifts you, it just cancels out the 32 ft/force of the usual field of the earth by slowing the wheel. This is real o gravity, a balance of the circus ride's field and the earth's.With the machines using this motif, instead of running away with the circus, you're not moving, and the wheel is. This makes the wheel's field lift you.. If the field influences you and holds you against the inside of the wheel (obvious how it makes your arms weigh a lot) it reaches all the way inside your body. So even if you're not moving around with it, the field will lift your wife the high wire goddesses' reach higher!

..More speed is considered to be of its use such as in voyages of long duration or it may cancel out the gravity inside a ship as it would slingshot around a star for a much higher speed at low cost. To boost gravity like on mars or other low gravity worlds, the opposite at the base of the wheel since going towards the surface instead of cancelling the gravity, doubles it or more as they say in the patents. Low gravity is unhealthy and higher gravity of high rpm would weigh more. (This is why the boss leaves on the Price is Right all day, he likes lots of cash and I'm the one who hopes all all of us will win a Van and splurges in Costa Rica!) You may say, "If the field spirals with the gyro this would make the 0g room spin around and around too, right?" A solution that's been invented is a machine made of alternate wheel slices that would spin in opposite motion in alternation. It would take a bit more power to spin the machine because of induction (friction) of the fields of the wheels, but the general upward of the field would cancel the gravity. Unlike how a usual magnet cancels the gravity by pressure, the spin of the wheel would cancel it by reducing pressure, or with lift, of the field, so the overall motion of the field is reduced unlike when we are compressed down between the usual gravity and antigravity of usual scintillation of electrons and other star shine compounds below us. (If the wife says, "People are like cathedral windows. They shine when the sun is out, but when the darkness sets in, their real beauty shines only if there is a light from within" this is why the wife if so beautious, wears a tiffany lamp shade on her head wherever she goes!) The usual field of gravity is flowing through us. With the machine of this type the motion is stopped and stabilized in it's rest frame just like a mass in fall at 32 ft per second. A boat in a moving field or a non moving field feels no force in either event if the boat is at rest relative to the field around it, if the boat flows with the overall field, just so the field is stationary relative to it. If the field relative to the boat is stopped for whatever reason, all force for masses in that field would be stopped.

.A power saving mode is by making the discs into just the arc of a wheel, so it wouldn't take so much power to spin a big gyro. (It's like with feetwear, I always have a box on hand so I never run out!) To make the field uniform like for science research or other use, since centrifugal force is changed both by mass and distance from the hub, fast moving weights compensate for the radiation outward of the field, depending where they were in the travel of the wheel. If a part of the work done is lost to the start and stop of the general oscillation of the machine instead of the outward flow of the field to cancel the gravity and so on, the disc slices would slow and go with reduced speed at the sides compared to the speed at the top of the travel of the wheel.

. Since a lot of power would be wasted to starting and stops of the wheel slices and since the field is a usual field like that of the momentum of the earth and moon where changes in motion make changes in the heat radiated out, the induced field at the sides is absorbed via electric field modules and wired to the motors powering the return path of the wheel slices. (Electromagnetism and gravity are the only two fields between the earth and moon, and a change of one is always a change of the other since quantity of motion is always conserved). This is much like an electric bicycle that charges up going down the hill, and stores the charge to use on the return up. Like any machine, the efficiency of the machine is not 100% and this would be much like other machines are, not in all realms, but always 100% no salt or BHT!

...It's believed this machine may be used for propulsion of space probes and vehicles. They're already using gyros to steer rockets by changing the speed or angle of the spin of the wheel. If gravity is electromagnetic with the speed of light (Einstein), the area of field between the ship and the foreward aimed engine would be a lower area of the field so it would reduce all the density of the field which by relativity is the barrier to faster than light travel. They have a patent on related technology that uses electric fields of the antigravity, or the word "antigravity" in the patent at any rate. This is the use of these wheel slices not to just lift the whole machine or add weight of the machine downward. My use here would be inside the wheel so it actually counteracts or adds the gravity of the person or other inside the machine.

...Carl Sagan in his book Demon Haunted World said some had an idea for antigravity machines that used a dome with a wheel that would spin via the outer edge of the dome where the wheel is. The area below the spin of the wheel was the lift. Apparently this was using the physics where if you have a spinning gyro a force is generated along the axis of spin. If your fingers of your right hand wrap in the spin direction, the direction of the force is that of your thumb. Two Japanese physicists in the 90's found that a spinning gyro weighs a bit less than a nonspinning wheel, but only by about a millionth of a lb.. This may be why we haven't heard a lot about Carl Sagan's machine, or others. Lee's invention although under the supervision of NASA she says is "for the good of mankind" so she opted out of a patent. The patent for the high speed ship power by the other inventor above just uses the word "antigravity" in quotation marks so perhaps this is not considered to be like the machines of this type. The machine Sagan uses is with the general field of the spin which would cancel out by a complete spin all the way round the wheel except for the small force of the torque. The machine here because it's inside the gyro on one side with the familiar strong centrifugal force wouldn't cancel out.

Others have had the idea of use of centrifugal force for propulsion, these machines are for antigravity itself. The distinction of this type of machine is that it's enough that the area of balanced field is inside it between the wheel and the point of outward radiance because there's no obstruction between the wheel and this realm.

As I say below my lower energy experiments turned out negative, so I propose a higher energy experiment as follows;

Ultracentrifuges have accelerations of billions of g's because they're so small the materials don't explode with the centrifugal force, and if we used oscillating discs they would perhaps have too much shear forces to generate the higher force if needed. Thus if we use discs like washers and they each spin in opposite alternation by just two rotary motors, the machine is simpler to make. All that would be needed to find out if there is indeed induction of mass as Einstein's equivalence of gravity and inertia or centrifugal force would be to send a mass through the washers inside below the top of each washer where we might think it was possible, the centrifigal force aimed above would cancel the gravity. Certainly if there is any mass induction we might expect to see it around a realm of billions of g's, around the top it wouldn't be antigravity, this is pressure of the field which is the same via the force from below cancelling out the gravity as we feel it (weight). The stretching of the field inside the machine might actually be antigravity. And as I say below even if not mutually exclusive the equivalence of inertia and gravity may only partially prove Einstein's idea here and even some inequivalence of gravity and inertia may allow the possibility of more than relativity, faster than light! Click here for my Physics Synopsis about this.

..The machines of this type they say in the patents would be useful for moving stuff around the room, ect. Other uses under consideration would be as a traction machine for road vehicles by turning the machine upside down to generate more force on the road by the wheels without adding much weight, and if of enough speed it would also be of use to actually lift a vehicle up in the air by the centrifugal force mostly up unlike usual gyros where all the spin cancels out in all directions. (The drill sarge in snow wouldn't have to shovel his jeep out of the snow, he'd just order the jeep out!) They say machines like this would make a silent airplane, much more stable in takeoff and landing. And it would make a good night's sleep in a lift bed, I'd lose more weight!

.. If you would like to make a donation to my site, thanks!

276 228 3465

LOTS MORE..

My Physics Links.

..

Experiments So Far

I took three 2 oz (56 gm) weights, each 9 inches from the center on the outside ends of 3 small radial "booms" and above them where they spin (the outer radius 10 inches from the axis) I suspended two other 56 gm,. weights between a balance point 13 inches across (6.5 inches to the center). One of the balancing weights is just above the three spinning weights, which spin at about 2 revolutions per second. The results (so far) are not definite at this level of resolution.

Consider however, that a spinning bucket filled with water has force acting on it and by conservation of momentum, if there is a force, there most be transfer of momentum by the field from where the work is being done to the rest of the cosmos, this is via the conservation of energy, the most well proven idea in the history of science, so this is a possibility worth looking into with stronger centrifugal force since mine is a relatively low resolution experiment. Just going on a wheel at the circus in summer offers proof that something can counteract, or augment the force. I looked and nowhere on the web or anywhere else I've read in 35 years is any description of the field around or in a centrifuge, certainly, just more knowledge about this may be of worth just for the worth of science, if there is no field found, it may be of real worth to other physics to know why. It's not uniform motion, if there is acceleration, the field is being flexed and it seems there would be radiation for the worth of energy conservation.

If inertia is not connected with gravity, this may have important consequences for General Relativity, Einstein believed they were almost the same. I've held that General Relativity was in error (Please see my PHYSICS SYNOPSES link below). When you change inertia around the wheel, the equivalent of a force like gravity would be induced with it that moves other mass around it like gravity does. My belief is that inertia and gravity are loosely connected, not as exactly as in General Relativity, because you can change the ratio of the two just by going on the Wheel of Vanna or going from the tropics to the N realms on earth. They are loosely connected so I think if no reduction of weights at higher RPM of masses around the wheel is seen, while not impossible, this would be disproof of General Relativity's stronger link between inertia and gravity, there may be no link in this experiment, if it were cosmic like Einstein believed it would seem to show up in all the physics. A looser connection is already disproof of Einstein's ideas about gravity and inertia (in my physics Special Relativity would still hold. Gravity is not the same as inertia, e.g. gravity has a source and is much weaker than inertia, gravity does work on the masses it flexes, inertia is without labor and so on. Click Here for my PHYSICS SYNOPSES for more.). A loose connection would be a way to allow some connection and prove energy conservation more, because with no connection of the field and outflow of the acceleration of it and the space around the spinning bucket of water, no pressure would be exerted on it. Both would be caused by a field exerting pressure, like the pressure felt on the earth's surface. These considerations lead to my belief that the change in the inertia of the wheel's surrounding field will show up at higher resolution of speed of the wheel. Disproof of this radiance of the wheel will only be definite at all levels of resolution, with both higher speeds and greater mass. The centrifugal force of the masses in the above experiment is not great, and the distance between the spinning weights and the balanced ones may be reduced, and so on. I've been doing more experiments with preliminary though still inconclusive results.

As look on the web shows, machines to convert angular to linear motion like this this are IP, so presumably it's already been proven to labor well with a machine already built. I've seen of at least two of these patents online, I saw another patent about a machine that has a boom and weight to oscillate and cause the force, with searches like "directed centrifugal force" (not antigravity) or in sites like patentdatabase.com (see links below) you may find a few like the boom and oscillation of the centrifugal mass machine. While I'm not the inventor it's a good idea however and I think it's worth notice. On this my own site I find many uses for this machine. One patent may be wrong about linear outward force, but I would doubt if more would be so. I think because my experiment is of lower mass in power and the other reasons also the motif of reduced mass may show up at higher speeds of the wheel. I'm not trying to patent these machines since this site is purely for for science, I'm asking about how the physics involved in how they work.

Both patent pages below are for the machine of this type, and another that uses a belt with weights presumably like the inventor Keely of the 19th century, to reduce the weight underneath the overarching masses.

Science News says the stakes are huge for antigravity, why isn't Keely's machine well known? My best intuition is that the other inventions of Keely were mostly without feasible worth and all the hubbub about Einstein's belief in no ether may have also stolen much of Keely's thunder even though Maxwell (who Einstein copied the most about physics) used the assumption of a resilient medium to exactly predict the speed of light. My belief is that both Keely and Maxwell may have been more correct than Einstein, Einstein's belief may have been more a blind alley about the speed of light. Waves like the ether would be more fundamental to physics than particles because all forces speak gravity, gravity connects up energy conservation, and continuous attraction is like a continuous wave not a discontinuous particle which can't unify all the fields. The density of the waves would determine the top speed of a force, like with light, not empty space with discontinuous particles. With Maxwell a higher speed of light would have more density higher speed, lower density a slower speed, and relativity doesn't explain how Maxwell achieved this, so this is one of Keely's machines that may be of worth.

Here's the patent with weights on tracks, and so on).

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4726241/claims.html


Here's the same invention but with a better description, and no drawing, the patentstorm link above has the drawing with not as good description

FreePatents Online Patent # 4726241..

Basically this my site is about what the field around the high speed wheel (not just the machine itself) may be like, because if you have a starship propelled by centrifugal force in one direction (as in the patents on the links) this is a force like rocket propulsion, and it would be used to lift masses in any direction, and against the gravity. This can easily be achieved with a balloon, or a helicopter and you weigh the same while you are being elevated. My basic question is about maximizing the force, if you were inside the oscillating machine between the wheel and axis moving with the wheel you would have force on the outside, and at the axle no force much, somewhere in-between them the forces would seem to cancel. This is not the same as saying the general lift of the machine, already proven, adds lift like when in a helicopter or a plane, with mass, this may be another motif of the field inside and around the machines of this type I'm researching.

PHYSICS SYNOPSES
-